The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Hit Ctrl-Alt-Delete, it's usually the simplest solution.

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Coligny » Fri May 10, 2013 5:40 pm

Grumpy Bumpy wrote:Thanks for your support, Coligny. Really appreciated!

Before I set up the machine, I saved the old smb.conf, which was working nicely on it and then simply slapped it back on after the reinstall. "



This is soooo not a good idea...

even webmin can crap sambas config files... don't get me started with the user/group ownership and permissions between reinstall... unless you have a complex security setup... chown/chgrp on the whole shares to put them straight is a good idea. 'specially since you told us aboot your /etc/sumthing ownership/authorisation misshaps.
For samba, you have to put standard unix troubleshooting logic aside, and start thinking the microsoft way... like a total psychopath...
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...

--Zee Litterbox Gigolo, rebel without a clue: I may be no better, but at least I am different. (Rousseau)
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:25 am
Location: In mah seekreet bunker watching thee end of the world while eating propcrorm...

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Fri May 10, 2013 11:51 pm

No webmin, no swat, just trusty old Nano and Geany :)

Thinking the Microsoft way, hmm, did you mean to 'chmod -R 777 /*' the box? :lol:

I have found some questions with exact my problem looking through Google-space, but found only questions, no answers. Tried a few small tweaks to no avail. The socket options tweak has also no measurable impact. At least, I get a relatively steady ~1.8MB/s through with syslog whining exactly every 30 seconds. Makes pulling a 40GB file for back-up a bit of a time-hog...

Here is the [global] part of my smb-conf. Maybe, I am just blind not to see an obvious glitch :dontknow
Code: Select all
[global]

## Browsing/Identification ###

   workgroup = HELL
   netbios name = SATAN
   server string = %h server

   wins support = yes
   local master = yes
   preferred master = yes
   dns proxy = no
   name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast


#### Debugging/Accounting ####

   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
   max log size = 1000
   syslog only = no
   syslog = 0
   panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d


####### Authentication #######

   security = user
   encrypt passwords = true
   passdb backend = tdbsam
   obey pam restrictions = no
   unix password sync = yes
   passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
   passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* .

   pam password change = no
   map to guest = bad user

########## Domains ###########

# nothing

########## Printing ##########

# nothing

############ Misc ############

#   socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Coligny » Sat May 11, 2013 3:20 am

Here with Samba 3.5.10-125.el6 CentOs 6.2
Screen Shot 2013-05-11 at 3.11.34 AM.jpg


First: the file server

Code: Select all
Linux sachiel.adarve.net 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 00:52:02 GMT 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


ifconfig (there shouldn't be so much traffic on eth1)
Code: Select all
br0       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:17:DE:10:84 
          inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fede:1084/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:156553909 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:87 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:7922324838 (7.3 GiB)  TX bytes:7458 (7.2 KiB)

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:17:DE:10:84 
          inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fede:1084/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:179378554 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:11964746 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:15584328203 (14.5 GiB)  TX bytes:1137543162 (1.0 GiB)
          Interrupt:16 Memory:fb6e0000-fb700000

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:17:DE:10:85 
          inet addr:192.168.117.122  Bcast:255.255.255.0  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::215:17ff:fede:1085/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1350  Metric:1
          RX packets:1952421246 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:1091344423 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:2188142076926 (1.9 TiB)  TX bytes:568112925217 (529.0 GiB)
          Interrupt:17 Memory:fb6a0000-fb6c0000

eth2      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1B:21:AD:97:5D 
          inet addr:192.168.117.21  Bcast:192.168.117.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::21b:21ff:fead:975d/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:148627152 errors:7 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:7
          TX packets:135303 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:9318483957 (8.6 GiB)  TX bytes:11635946 (11.0 MiB)
          Interrupt:16 Memory:fbec0000-fbee0000

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback 
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:78735 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:78735 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:6441157 (6.1 MiB)  TX bytes:6441157 (6.1 MiB)

virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 52:54:00:BB:8D:EC 
          inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:244618 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:31673226 (30.2 MiB)

vnet0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:54:00:A5:58:42 
          inet6 addr: fe80::fc54:ff:fea5:5842/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:11761486 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:167582198 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
          RX bytes:1124109842 (1.0 GiB)  TX bytes:12542713539 (11.6 GiB)

My wins server is on another masheen.

Code: Select all
[root@sachiel ~]# more /etc/samba/smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from UNKNOWN (0.0.0.0)
# Date: 2012/04/30 23:18:41

[global]
   workgroup = ADARVE
   server string = Main File server
   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
   max log size = 50
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536
   local master = No
   wins server = 192.168.117.20
   read list = lecture
   write list = ecriture
   cups options = raw


[printers]
   comment = All Printers
   path = /var/spool/samba
   printable = Yes
   browseable = No

[EBooks]
   path = /media/array_lvm_1/EBooks
   valid users = lecture, ecriture
   read only = No

[Intraweb]
   path = /media/array_lvm_1/intraweb
   valid users = lecture, ecriture
   read only = No

[MidgetPorn]
   path = /media/array_lvm_1/MidgetPorn
   valid users = lecture, ecriture
   read only = No

[Software]
   path = /media/array_lvm_1/Software
   valid users = lecture, ecriture
   read only = No

[TimeCapsules]
   copy = Software
   path = /media/array_lvm_1/TimeCapsules



WINS/DNS server:
Code: Select all
Linux matariel.adarve.net 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.i686 #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 22:09:08 BST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux


Code: Select all
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 52:54:00:4D:2F:00 
          inet addr:192.168.117.20  Bcast:192.168.117.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe4d:2f00/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:37229807 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2176305 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:2658444159 (2.4 GiB)  TX bytes:304860124 (290.7 MiB)

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback 
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:35499 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:35499 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:3416460 (3.2 MiB)  TX bytes:3416460 (3.2 MiB)


Code: Select all
[root@matariel samba]# more smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from UNKNOWN (0.0.0.0)
# Date: 2012/04/24 20:09:14

[global]
   workgroup = ADARVE
   server string = Samba Server Version %v
   log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
   max log size = 50
   socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536
   [b]os level = 255[/b]
   preferred master = Yes
   domain master = Yes
   wins proxy = Yes
   wins support = Yes
   cups options = raw

[printers]
   comment = All Printers
   path = /var/spool/samba
   printable = Yes
   browseable = No
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...

--Zee Litterbox Gigolo, rebel without a clue: I may be no better, but at least I am different. (Rousseau)
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:25 am
Location: In mah seekreet bunker watching thee end of the world while eating propcrorm...

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Coligny » Sat May 11, 2013 6:14 am

Also, do you check what's happening on client and server with nmon ? (http://nmon.sourceforge.net/pmwiki.php)

Sometime it helps to see where things are clogging up...
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...

--Zee Litterbox Gigolo, rebel without a clue: I may be no better, but at least I am different. (Rousseau)
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:25 am
Location: In mah seekreet bunker watching thee end of the world while eating propcrorm...

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Sat May 11, 2013 3:25 pm

I was planning to look at the transaction with wireshark or ethereal or something. I'll have a look and will check-out nmon, too.

Last night I tried the tweaks mentioned here.
Code: Select all
max protocol = smb2
aio write size = 1
aio read size = 1
vfs objects = aio_fork
max protocol did nothing. The "aio" stuff did, as mentioned later in that thread, no good either, but it was worth a try. Might have to go look for another bug, that better matches my problem :)
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby yanpa » Sun May 12, 2013 10:19 pm

Hmm, not so good:
Code: Select all
[127604.804866] EXT4-fs error (device sda1) in ext4_da_writepages:2324: Journal has aborted


Cheap SSD is cheap :idea:
Q: Why is the French giving different advice?
Sir John: Their advice is not based on science.
User avatar
yanpa
Octopus
 
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:20 am
Location: 東京都

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby yanpa » Sun May 12, 2013 10:30 pm

Cheap SSD now evidently not bootable...
Q: Why is the French giving different advice?
Sir John: Their advice is not based on science.
User avatar
yanpa
Octopus
 
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:20 am
Location: 東京都

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby yanpa » Sun May 12, 2013 10:48 pm

Back again after poking at the BIOS settings. Thinking about it, the failure coincides with warmer weather and me finally getting round to putting the side panel back on the case and pushing it into an aesthetically more pleasing if less well-ventilated location. Also, said SSD is mounted directly beneath a real HD which is generating some heat. I wonder if correlation = causation. Or maybe it's just causation = cheap SSD. "TOSHIBA THNSNS12" if anyone's taking notes.
Q: Why is the French giving different advice?
Sir John: Their advice is not based on science.
User avatar
yanpa
Octopus
 
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:20 am
Location: 東京都

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Coligny » Mon May 13, 2013 12:12 am

if it's anything like crucial ssd's... check for firmware update...

if not... enjoy the heatgun's reflow ...
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...

--Zee Litterbox Gigolo, rebel without a clue: I may be no better, but at least I am different. (Rousseau)
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:25 am
Location: In mah seekreet bunker watching thee end of the world while eating propcrorm...

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby yanpa » Mon May 13, 2013 10:16 pm

Well it's survived the day with side panel removed... doesn't prove anything yet though...
Q: Why is the French giving different advice?
Sir John: Their advice is not based on science.
User avatar
yanpa
Octopus
 
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:20 am
Location: 東京都

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Mon May 13, 2013 11:05 pm

Has "smartctl --all /dev/cheapssd" no suggestions?
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Coligny » Tue May 14, 2013 2:19 am

there are still people believing in smart reporting ?

SMART has 3 answers:
Might be good.
Don't know yet.
&
It's dead, Jim.

Basically, i'm surprised the dev didn't replace the binary with a shell script saying either "42" or just plain old "fuck you" to any query...
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...

--Zee Litterbox Gigolo, rebel without a clue: I may be no better, but at least I am different. (Rousseau)
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:25 am
Location: In mah seekreet bunker watching thee end of the world while eating propcrorm...

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Wed May 15, 2013 2:14 am

I have decided to postpone the solution-seeking for my samba-problem until I have moved my command-bridge over to a new pc, because it makes no sense to find a solution and thereafter scrap the bugger rededicate the computer to other important challenges.

New computer with Xubuntu 13.04 ran a (1) transfer of a large file with ~100MB/s to the same server both ways, which is better than the 2MB/s from the old box. Looks almost like a relatively solid gigabit connection even though data gets squeezed through pretty old cabling. That was one trial run only. So future will tell if time solves problems.
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby yanpa » Thu May 16, 2013 7:50 am

Coligny wrote:there are still people believing in smart reporting ?

SMART has 3 answers:
Might be good.
Don't know yet.
&
It's dead, Jim.

Basically, i'm surprised the dev didn't replace the binary with a shell script saying either "42" or just plain old "fuck you" to any query...



Well it's still working...

Code: Select all
# smartctl /dev/sda -a
smartctl 6.0 2012-10-10 r3643 [x86_64-linux-3.4.33-2.24-desktop] (SUSE RPM)
Copyright (C) 2002-12, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model:     TOSHIBA THNSNS120GBSP
Serial Number:    52ES107ITXMZ
LU WWN Device Id: 0 000000 000000000
Firmware Version: TPGABBF0
User Capacity:    120,034,123,776 bytes [120 GB]
Sector Size:      512 bytes logical/physical
Rotation Rate:    Solid State Device
Device is:        Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall]
ATA Version is:   ATA8-ACS, ACS-2 T13/2015-D revision 3
SATA Version is:  SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is:    Thu May 16 07:47:35 2013 JST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

...

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000a   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
  2 Throughput_Performance  0x0005   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Offline      -       0
  3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0007   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
  7 Unknown_SSD_Attribute   0x000b   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  8 Unknown_SSD_Attribute   0x0005   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Offline      -       0
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       345
10 Unknown_SSD_Attribute   0x0013   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       23
167 Unknown_Attribute       0x0022   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
168 Unknown_Attribute       0x0012   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
169 Unknown_Attribute       0x0013   120   120   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       164169519
170 Unknown_Attribute       0x0013   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
173 Unknown_Attribute       0x0013   195   195   100    Pre-fail  Always       -       4305715260
175 Program_Fail_Count_Chip 0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
177 Wear_Leveling_Count     0x0000   000   000   000    Old_age   Offline      -       7
181 Program_Fail_Cnt_Total  0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
182 Erase_Fail_Count_Total  0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0012   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       7
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   100   052   000    Old_age   Always       -       0 (0 48 0 0 0)
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x0022   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
233 Media_Wearout_Indicator 0x0000   000   000   000    Old_age   Offline      -       6173
240 Unknown_SSD_Attribute   0x0013   100   100   050    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
241 Total_LBAs_Written      0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       249
242 Total_LBAs_Read         0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       35


Hmm...
Q: Why is the French giving different advice?
Sir John: Their advice is not based on science.
User avatar
yanpa
Octopus
 
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:20 am
Location: 東京都

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Thu May 16, 2013 12:24 pm

Pre_fail, pre_fail, pre_fail; I'd say, run for the hills :lol:
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Sun May 26, 2013 7:20 pm

Burning in my new box. Apart from the usual hick-ups with a new box/OS I am quite pleased with that thing. Runs relatively quickly and XFCE's "Catfish File Search" actually does find files that I am searching for, all throughout the network and reasonably quickly, which is awesomely awesome. No GUI-tool has been able to satisfy my many wishes before, so I assume that Catfish will soon stop running :lol:

The old box, which still runs as a dinghi alongside my new mothership, preventing it from capsizing now and then, still has the Samba-issues, though. As has my laptop, so I am still deep in the groats on that one.
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby yanpa » Sun May 26, 2013 7:55 pm

Grumpy Bumpy wrote: No GUI-tool has been able to satisfy my many wishes before, so I assume that Catfish will soon stop running :lol:


Enjoy it while it lasts.

I still want my KDE 3.5 back (with the Kmail bugs fixed, and the ease-of-installation/hardware compatibility of 8.0-ish Ubuntu).
Q: Why is the French giving different advice?
Sir John: Their advice is not based on science.
User avatar
yanpa
Octopus
 
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:20 am
Location: 東京都

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Coligny » Sun May 26, 2013 9:15 pm

There are filesearch programs that actually do work ?
I gave up on OSx... When there is a file/movie i like i just make 12 copies in every possible places... For the others, i just redownload from the intarweb....
Took me 2 weeks to find my previous copy of skyf4ll versus 15 minutes to do download it again... I moved it by mistake with the pr0n sky-hd series... Even direct "find" or "locate" on the server where coming back empty...

it's sad that personnal computing jump directly from "awkward stuff for geeks" to "privacy anal raping tool of the devil" without making a quick stop by "just fucking work"
OSX endless network directory tech switches really didn't help... Could barely finish reading the manual of a version before a new 10.X revision change canned it... Gave up before 10.3... And dun't get me startedon their NFS implementation madness....
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...

--Zee Litterbox Gigolo, rebel without a clue: I may be no better, but at least I am different. (Rousseau)
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:25 am
Location: In mah seekreet bunker watching thee end of the world while eating propcrorm...

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Wed May 29, 2013 2:37 am

Grumpy Bumpy wrote:GetDeb is gone :(
It's back on again and they didn't tell me. Keeping it running by the skin of a hole in their last tooth?
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

Re: The *nix Thread of POSIX-Compliance

Postby Grumpy Bumpy » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:11 pm

Takes me like 30 minutes to print a simple and basic page from Firefox. Not that I would be printing much, lately. And printing with Linux/Postscript has always been sluggish with my Brother HL-1870N from 2003 or 2004. But that was like a 2 minutes' wait, not 30. Slows down work too much, mainly if you quickly want to print out something for someone who is waiting. "The printing process is going rather well, takes a little more time, though. Another cup of coffee, ma'am?"

But then I have no idea how to tackle this. Will do some tests with office etc to see, if the hick-up is general or just Firefox. :dontknow
✞☢☠ Croque Monsieur ☠☢✞
User avatar
Grumpy Bumpy
Sasquatch
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: 地獄の便所

PreviousNext

Return to Computers and Computing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron
octopus